万维书刊网微信二维码

扫微信,关注编辑QQ!

投稿问答最小化  关闭

您的位置:万维书刊网 >>自然科学综合>>自然科学总论
您的位置:万维书刊网 >>国内sci期刊>>自然科学

中国科学:生命科学(英文版)(Science China Life Sciences)(中国科学C辑:生命科学)(英文版) (官网投稿)

简介
  • 期刊简称待设置
  • 参考译名待设置
  • 核心类别 CSCD核心(2025-2026), 科技核心(2025学术卷), SCIE核心, 知网收录, 目次收录(维普),第一批认定学术期刊,外文期刊,
  • IF影响因子待设置
  • 自引率待设置
  • 主要研究方向待设置展开更多

主要研究方向:

等待设置主要研究方向
待设置

《中国科学:生命科学》(英文版)(Science China Life Sciences)(月刊)创刊于1996年,是中国科学院主管、中国科学院和国家自然科学基金委员会共同主办的自然科学综合性学术刊物,主要刊载自然科学各领域基础研究和应用研究方面具有创新性的、高水平的、有重要意义的研究成果。
征稿信息

万维提示:

1、投稿方式:在线投稿。

2、刊内网址(202511期):

http://life.scichina.com自动跳转至:

https://www.sciengine.com/SCLS/home

http://www.springer.com/11427

http://link.springer.com/journal/11427

3投稿系统:

https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/scls

4、刊内邮箱:life@scichina.org

  官网邮箱:life@scichina.com

  (更多编辑邮箱详见官网信息)

5、刊内电话:010-64015399

6、出刊日期:月刊,每月5日出版。

20251210日星期三

                           

 

Submission Guidelines

【官网信息】

 

Submit online

Please visit life.scichina.com, click “Submission & Review”, and use ScholarOne Manuscript System to submit a manuscript. For a new user, please create an account and submit a manuscript following the guidance.

Authors should also submit such accompanying materials as a short statement on the research background, area/subarea and significance of the work, a brief introduction to the first and corresponding authors including their mailing addresses, post codes, telephone numbers, fax numbers, and email addresses. Authors may suggest several referees (please supply full names, addresses, phone numbers, fax and emails), and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

·The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

·The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)).

·A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g., “salami-publishing”).

·No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions

·No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted.

·Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

·Consent to submit has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted.

·Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

In addition:

·Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.

·Requests to add or delete authors at revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

·Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc.

If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines.  If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been proven, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:

·If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.

·If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note.

·The author’s institution may be informed.

Copyright

A completed form assigning copyright to Science China Press must be returned to the editorial office when the paper is accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article (in various languages), including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or other reproductions of similar nature. The Copyright Transfer Statement is available at www.life.scichina.com.

Authorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work. Submission of a manuscript is taken to imply that all the named authors are aware that they are listed as co-authors, and they have seen and agreed to the submitted version. The corresponding author is the one who should take the major responsibility to ensure that the submitted manuscripts are properly prepared in all aspects.

Disclosure of potential conflict of interests

Authors must disclose all relationships or interests that could influence or bias the work. Although an author may not feel there are conflicts, disclosure of relationships and interests affords a more transparent process, leading to an accurate and objective assessment of the work. Awareness of real or perceived conflicts of interests is a perspective to which the readers are entitled and is not meant to imply that a financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research or compensation for consultancy work is inappropriate. Examples of potential conflicts of interests that are directly or indirectly related to the research may include but are not limited to the following:

·Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number)

·Honoraria for speaking at symposia

·Financial support for attending symposia

·Financial support for educational programs

·Employment or consultation

·Support from a project sponsor

·Position on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships

·Multiple affiliations

·Financial relationships, for example equity ownership or investment interest

·Intellectual property rights (e.g., patents, copyrights and royalties from such rights)

·Holdings of spouse and/or children that may have financial interest in the work

In addition, interests that go beyond financial interests and compensation (non-financial interests) that may be important to readers should be disclosed. These may include but are not limited to personal relationships or competing interests directly or indirectly tied to this research, or professional interests or personal beliefs that may influence your research.

The corresponding author will include a summary statement in the text of the manuscript in a separate section before the acknowledgements.

See below examples of disclosures:

Funding: This study was funded by X (grant number X).

Conflict of Interest: Author A has received research grants from Company A. Author B has received a speaker honorarium from Company X and owns stock in Company Y. Author C is a member of committee Z.

If no conflict exists, the authors should state:

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

All individuals have individual rights that are not to be infringed. Individual participants in studies e.g. have the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered and to what they have said e.g. during a study or an interview as well as to any photograph that was taken. Hence it is important that all participants gave their informed consent in writing prior to inclusion in the study. Identifying details (names, dates of birth, identity numbers and other information) of the participants that were studied should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and genetic profiles unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the participant (or parent or guardian if the participant is incapable) has given written informed consent for publication. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases, and informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific meaning.

The following statement should be included:

Informed consent: “Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”

If identifying information about participants is available in the article, the following statement should be included:

Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.”

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

When reporting studies that involve human participants, authors should include a statement that the studies have been approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that the independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study.

The following statements should be included in the text before the References section:

Ethical approval: “All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”

The welfare of animals used for research must be respected. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

For studies with animals, the following statement should be included:

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.”

If articles do not contain studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors, Springer recommends including the following sentence:

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.”

For retrospective studies, please add the following sentence:

For this type of study formal consent is not required.”

......

更多详见:

https://www.sciengine.com/SCLS/authorCenter?scroll=section_1

 

  • 万维QQ投稿交流群    招募志愿者

    版权所有 Copyright@2009-2015豫ICP备2021036211号

     纯自助论文投稿平台    E-mail:1121090112@qq.com;eshukan@163.com


投稿问答最小化  关闭

投稿有问题?问问网友吧!

问答