万维书刊网微信二维码

扫微信,关注编辑QQ!

您的位置:万维书刊网 >>sci/e期刊大全 >>医药卫生3>>卫生保健与服务
您的位置:万维书刊网 >>ssci期刊 >>社会学类>>伦理学
您的位置:万维书刊网 >>ssci期刊 >>综合类等>>生物医学和社会科学

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT《黑斯廷斯中心报告》 (官网投稿)

简介
  • 期刊简称HASTINGS CENT REP
  • 参考译名《黑斯廷斯中心报告》
  • 核心类别 SSCI(2023版), SCIE(2023版), 外文期刊,
  • IF影响因子
  • 自引率3.40%
  • 主要研究方向医学-卫生保健; ETHICS; SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL 伦理学;生物医学与社会科学

主要研究方向:

等待设置主要研究方向
医学-卫生保健; ETHICS; SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL 伦理学;生物医学与社会科学

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT《黑斯廷斯中心报告》(双月刊). The Hastings Center Report explores the ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health ca...[显示全部]
征稿信息

万维提示:

1、投稿方式:在线投稿。

2、期刊网址:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1552146x

https://www.thehastingscenter.org/publications-resources/hastings-center-report/

3、投稿网址:http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/hast

4、期刊刊期:双月刊,一年出版6期。

2021114日星期四

                              


投稿须知【官网信息】

 

Author Guidelines

Manuscript Submission and Review

The Hastings Center Report  welcomes manuscript submissions that address ethical concerns in medicine and the life sciences. Prospective contributions should be clearly written and of interest to a broad readership. They may take many forms:

articles that explore philosophical and ethical issues in medicine, health care, technology, medical research, the use of human subjects in research, and the environment;

mid-length essays and brief commentary (for our Perspective column) on developments that raise bioethical questions;

reports or reviews of empirical studies that implicate relevant philosophical and ethical questions;

case studies (which may be accompanied by commentary on the case);

personal narratives about providing health care (for our In Practice column);

book reviews; and

commentaries on items we have previously published (for our Exchange department).

Most articles and empirical reviews accepted for publication are no longer than 6,000 words, and short essays no longer than 2,400 words. Shorter work is encouraged. Tables and figures should be kept to a minimum. References should be restricted to the most pertinent, up-to-date sources; heavily referenced manuscripts are not preferred. For case studies, descriptions should be about 400 words, and commentaries should be no more than 650 words. Brief commentaries should be no longer than 800 words. Essays for the In Practice column should be no more than 1600 words. Op-eds submitted for Perspective, which appears on the inside back cover of the Report and concerns a topical issue, should be no more than 650 words. Book reviews are usually commissioned, but unsolicited manuscripts will be considered and should be no longer than 1,600 words.

In matters of grammar and usage, the Report refers to the Chicago Manual of Style (although for purposes of review, manuscripts need not conform to this). Authors' instructions for formatting endnotes are available below.

Article Preparation Support

Wiley Editing Services offers expert help with English Language Editing, as well as translation, manuscript formatting, figure illustration, figure formatting, and graphical abstract design – so you can submit your manuscript with confidence. Also, check out resources for Preparing Your Article for general guidance about writing and preparing your manuscript.

Article Promotion Support

Wiley Editing Services offers professional video, design, and writing services to create sharable video abstracts, infographics, conference posters, lay summaries, and research news stories for your research – so you can help your research get the attention it deserves.

How to Submit

Manuscripts should be submitted via the Report’s ScholarOne Manuscripts review system at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/hast. Names and contact information for the author(s) should not appear on the manuscript text. The system will prompt you for all additional information that we need for review, including authors’ names and contact information, the type of item you are submitting (whether it is an article, essay, Case Study, Perspective, In Practice, or book review), a brief abstract, and a disclosure of any conflicts of interest. The system also allows you to give us suggestions for possible reviewers.

Review Procedure

Manuscripts will be acknowledged upon receipt. Feature articles, all reports and reviews of empirical work, and many short essays recommended for consideration by the editor will also be reviewed by an independent reader. Manuscripts recommended after this second review will be presented to the Report's Editorial Committee for final disposition. Authors will be notified of a decision by email.

The Editorial Committee consists of Gregory E. Kaebnick (editor of theReport), Laura Haupt (managing editor), Nancy Berlinger (research scholar), Susan Gilbert (public affairs editor), Michael Gusmano (research scholar), Josephine Johnston (research scholar), and Erik Parens (research scholar).

Conflict of Interest

The Hastings Center Report expects all prospective contributors and reviewers to declare any potential conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest include any personal or professional affiliations, any financial interests, and/or any past, present, or anticipated activities that may compromise the quality or objectivity of a manuscript or review. The rough test that we ask authors and reviewers to employ is, Is there anything that would likely cause readers to second-guess your objectivity if it were to emerge after publication? Authors will be asked to disclose conflicts of interest when a manuscript is submitted for consideration to the Report.

Authors' Instructions for Formatting References

The Report prefers to keep references to a minimum. Our style avoids discursive notes wherever possible, and we ask that citations be restricted to the most important or useful sources.

For questions on any formatting issue not specified below, please see the guidelines set out in the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition.

Monographs:

1. S. Hauerwas, Naming the Silences: God, Medicine, and the Problem of Suffering (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1990), 64-68. Emphasis added. [Include page numbers if passages appear in the article.]

2. R. R. Faden and T. L. Beauchamp, A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).

3. Hauerwas, Naming the Silences, 64.

More than three authors: D. Schneider et al.,… [no comma before "et al."]. Second reference: Schneider et al.,…

Omit "Publishing Company," "Co.," "Inc.," "Ltd.," etc.

Page numbers: When inclusive page numbers begin with a multiple of 100, all three digits of the second number are used (200-234). In all other instances use only the last two digits of the second number (70-77, 205-34). More complete rules are found in the Chicago Manual of Style.

Journals:

4. G. J. Annas, "Whose Waste Is It Anyway? The Case of John Moore," Hastings Center Report 18, no. 5 (1988): 37-39, at 38. [Here, "at 38" indicates that a quotation in the text appears on that page.]

5. See T. A. Shannon and A.B. Wolter, "Reflections on the Moral Status of the Pre-Embryo," Theological Studies 51 (1990): 603-26.

6. Annas, "Whose Waste?," 38.

A reference that immediately follows another reference to the same work is placed in the text and consists only of page numbers in parentheses, i.e., "(p. 64)" or "(p. 64, emphasis added)."

Omit "The" in journal titles.

List issue number (or month, if there is no issue number) if necessary to disambiguate the reference. For example, no issue number is needed for the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association, which use a single set of consecutive page numbers throughout a volume.

The titles of all journals should be spelled out in full.

Editor as Author:

7. E. F. Kittay and D. T. Myers, eds., Women and Moral Theory (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1987), 234.

8. Kittay and Meyers, Women and Moral Theory, 200-234.

Article in an Anthology:

9. B. Steinbock, "The Moral Status of Extracorporeal Embryos," in Ethics and Biotechnology, ed. A. Dyson and J. Harris (London, U.K.: Routledge, 1994), 79-82, at 80. [The clause "at 80" is needed if the citation is giving the location of a quotation.]

10. J. Cohen and R.L. Hotz, "Toward Policies regarding Assisted Reproductive Technologies," in Setting Allocation Priorities: Genetic and Reproductive Technologies, ed. R.H. Blank and A. Bonnicksen (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992), 228-29.

11. Steinbock, "Moral Status," 82.

12. B. Steinway, "On the Stem Cell Debate," in Setting Allocation Priorities, ed. Blank and Bonnicksen, 230-40.

[In note 9, "ed." means "edited by" and thus is not "eds."]

Government Documents:

13. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Neonatal Intensive Care for Low Birthweight Infants: Costs and Effectiveness (Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, December 1987), 21.

Websites:

14. Families USA, "One in Three: Non-Elderly Americans Without Health Insurance, 2002-2003," June 2004, athttp://www.familiesusa.org/site/DocServer/

82_million_uninsured_report.pdf?docID=3641.

15. P. B. Ginsburg, "Can Hospitals and Physicians Shift the Effects of Cuts in Medicare Reimbursement to Private Payers?" Web exclusive, Health Affairs (2003): 473, athttp://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.w3.472v1.pdf.

Please note that access dates are omitted from both these references. Access dates are necessary only if the site is likely to have substantive changes and the citation carries no publication date.


  • 万维QQ投稿交流群    招募志愿者

    版权所有 Copyright@2009-2015豫ICP证合字09037080号

     纯自助论文投稿平台    E-mail:eshukan@163.com


投稿问答最小化  关闭

投稿有问题?问问网友吧!

问答