万维书刊网微信二维码

扫微信,关注编辑QQ!

投稿问答最小化  关闭

您的位置:万维书刊网 >>国内sci期刊>>社科经管
您的位置:万维书刊网 >>中国国际期刊>>农林水产综合

中国农业经济评论(英文)(China Agricultural Economic Review)(国际刊号) (官网投稿)

简介
  • 期刊简称CHINA AGR ECON REV
  • 参考译名《中国农业经济评论》
  • 核心类别 AMI核心国际刊(2022版), 高质量科技期刊(T3-2025), SCIE核心, SSCI核心, 目次收录(维普), 知网外文库,
  • IF影响因子
  • 自引率
  • 主要研究方向ECONOMICS 经济学展开更多

主要研究方向:

等待设置主要研究方向
ECONOMICS 经济学

《中国农业经济评论(英文)》(China Agricultural Economic Review)(季刊),于2008年由中国农业大学和英国Emerald出版集团联合创办并向全球公开发行的一本英文国际学术季刊。该杂志旨在发表可应用于中国农业和农村决策过程、农业经济学学科发展以及希望借鉴中国农业和农村发展的发展中国家的研究。
征稿信息

万维提示:

1、该刊只有国际刊号。

2、投稿方式:在线投稿。

3、官网网址:

https://caer.cau.edu.cn/

https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/caer

4、投稿系统:

https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/caer

5、主办单位相关网址:

https://www.cau.edu.cn/xkky/xsky/xxzb/index.htm

(中国农业大学学术期刊)

6、官网电话:010-62738685

7、官网邮箱:caer@cau.edu.cn

8、出刊日期:季刊,一年出版4期。

9、官网微信公众号:CAER编辑部

2026129日星期四

                        

 

Author guidelines

【官网信息】

 

Before you start

For queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details can be found in the Editorial Team section.

Author responsibilities

Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is that you will:

Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.

Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity.

Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.

Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:

Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).

Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.

In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work. The author(s) must describe the content created or modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI tool used; any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be appropriately cited and referenced. Standard tools that are used to improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of this guidance. The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine whether the use of an AI tool is permissible.

If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage

Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:

1) Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.&

2) AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.

3) AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.

Copywriting (creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not permitted.

Copy-editing (correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the following overarching principles.

Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.

Research and publishing ethics

Our editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website.

We have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines. If you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.

A few key points:

Any manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form. Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference paper policies.  If any substantial element of your paper has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use Crossref Similarity Check to check on the originality of submissions received. This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works from 800 scholarly publishers.

Your work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under consideration by any other publication.Failure to comply with this may result in your work being desk-rejected by the journal editorial office.

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission; this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics guidelines.

By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.

If you have written about a company/individual/organisation in detail using information that is not publicly available, have spent time within that company/organisation, or the work features named/interviewed employees, you will need to clear permission by using the consent to publish form; please also see our permissions guidance for full details. If you have to clear permission with the company/individual/organisation, consent must be given either by the named individual in question or their representative, a board member of the company/organisation, or a HR department representative of the company/organisation.

You have an ethical obligation and responsibility to conduct your research in adherence to national and international research ethics guidelines, as well as the ethical principles outlined by your discipline and any relevant authorities, and to be transparent about your research methods in such a way that all involved in the publication process may fairly and appropriately evaluate your work. For all research involving human participants, you must ensure that you have obtained informed consent, meaning that you must inform all participants in your work (or their legal representative) as to why the research is being conducted, whether their anonymity is protected, how their data will be stored and used, and whether there are any associated risks from participation in the study; the submitted work must confirm that informed consent was obtained and detail how this was addressed in accordance with our policy on informed consent.

Where appropriate, you must provide an ethical statement within the submitted work confirming that your research received institutional and national (or international) ethical approval, and that it complies with all relevant guidelines and regulations for studies involving humans, whether that be data, individuals, or samples. Specifically, the statement should contain the name and location of the institutional ethics reviewing committee or review board, the approval number, the date of approval, and the details of the national or international guidelines that were followed, as well as any other relevant information. You should also include details of how the work adheres to relevant consent guidelines along with confirming that informed consent was secured for all participants. The details of these statements should ensure that author and participant anonymity is not compromised. Any work submitted without a suitable ethical statement and details of informed consent for all participants, where required, will be returned to the authors and will not be considered further until appropriate and clear documentation is provided. Emerald reserves the right to reject work without sufficient evidence of informed consent from human participants and ethical approval where required.

......

更多详见:

https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/caer?id=caer#editorial-team

精彩点评摘录 查看所有点评明细
  • 2021/2/3 11:12:37
    一条小河对中国农业经济评论(英文)(China Agricultural Economic Review)(国际刊号)的点评:
    一个朋友的同事,投稿找了个假网站,陕西桂红财网络科技有限公司邸桂红和吴金良 山海浦发银行 卡号7207 0078 8010 0000 0541 吴金良 卡号:6215590607008611903开户网点:工商银行内蒙古呼伦贝尔市 额尔古纳支行 ,QQ739345710,被骗了几千元。大家投稿一定找真正的投稿网址。
查看更多点评明细
  • 万维QQ投稿交流群    招募志愿者

    版权所有 Copyright@2009-2015豫ICP备2021036211号

     纯自助论文投稿平台    E-mail:1121090112@qq.com;eshukan@163.com


投稿问答最小化  关闭

投稿有问题?问问网友吧!

问答