应对文献引用评论：在同行评审中如何回应（2）

引言

在学术出版的同行评审过程中，审稿人对文献引用的评论是常见的。正确地回应这些评论对于维护论文的学术严谨性和完整性至关重要。以下是五个英文模板，用于回应审稿人关于文献引用的不同评论：

模板1：同意添加新的文献引用

英文模板："Thank you for suggesting the inclusion of [Author(s) Name(s)]'s work on [specific topic]. We have now cited this study in the revised manuscript to provide additional context on [related subject area]."

模板2：同意添加

英文模板："We appreciate the reviewer's recommendation to include more recent literature on [specific topic]. We have conducted further research and have added citations to [newly identified author(s)] in the revised manuscript."

模板3：解释为何不添加新引用

英文模板："We respect the reviewer's suggestion to cite [specific author(s)] on [specific topic]. However, after careful consideration, we believe that our current references are comprehensive and sufficiently address [related subject area]."

模板4：现有引用已足够全面

英文模板："Thank you for your feedback. We have reviewed our literature citations and are confident that the references we have included from [field-specific authorities] are appropriate and provide a solid foundation for our [argument/research method]."

模板5：现有引用与研究重点不符

英文模板："We appreciate the opportunity to expand our literature review. However, the suggested references, while valuable, do not directly align with the core focus of our study, which is centered on [study's core focus]. We have maintained our selective approach to ensure the manuscript's coherence."

转自理论学习计算未来微信公众号，仅作学习交流，如有侵权，请联系本站删除！