回应研究方法评论：同行评审中的平衡艺术（2）

引言

在学术论文中，研究方法部分是审稿人关注的核心之一，因为它支撑着研究结果的有效性和可靠性。无论是同意进行修改还是决定坚持原有方法，回应关于研究方法的评论都需要一种深思熟虑和合理的方式。本文将探讨如何有效且专业地处理这些批评。

研究方法的重要性

研究方法是任何科学研究的基础，它详细描述了研究过程中所遵循的步骤。审稿人对方法的评论旨在确保研究的透明度、可复制性和科学严谨性。

模板1：同意增加方法细节

英文模板："We concur with the reviewer's suggestion to provide more details on the [specific method]. We have expanded our description in the revised manuscript, particularly focusing on [aspect of the method]."

模板2：同意修改研究方法

英文模板："Thank you for your feedback on our [specific method]. We agree that [alternative method] would be a valuable addition to our analysis and have revised the manuscript accordingly."

模板3：拒绝修改并解释理由

英文模板："While we respect the reviewer's perspective on the [specific method], we believe that our approach is justified for the following reasons: [reason 1], [reason 2], and [reason 3]. We have maintained our original method in the revised manuscript."

模板4：请求审稿人提供更多信息

英文模板："We appreciate the reviewer's comments on our [specific method]. To better understand your suggestions, could you please provide more details on [specific aspect]? This information will help us address your concerns more effectively."

模板5：解释为何不采纳建议

英文模板："Thank you for your recommendations regarding the [specific method]. However, after careful consideration, we have decided not to incorporate [suggested change] at this time. Our decision is based on [reason 1], [reason 2], and the potential impact on [specific aspect of the study]."

转自理论学习计算未来微信公众号，仅作学习交流，如有侵权，请联系本站删除！